This document provides markup signs and focus areas for implementing the Core Web Framework based on the FRAMEWORK-ROADMAP.MD.
π¦ AUTHENTICATION/AUTHORIZATION MODULE
CRITICAL MARKUP: [CORE-AUTH]
- Extract JWT implementation β crates/core-auth
- Separate OIDC integration β crates/core-auth-oidc
- Create authentication trait interfaces β core-auth-traits
- Implement testing utilities β core-auth-testing
ποΈ DATABASE ABSTRACTION MODULE
CRITICAL MARKUP: [CORE-DB]
- Extract database connection pooling β crates/core-db-pool
- Separate query builder implementations β crates/core-db-query
- Create database trait interfaces β core-db-traits
- Implement migration utilities β core-db-migration
γγ£γγ·γ³γ° CACHING LAYER MODULE
CRITICAL MARKUP: [CORE-CACHE]
- Extract in-memory caching (Moka) β crates/core-cache-moka
- Separate distributed caching (Redis) β crates/core-cache-redis
- Create caching trait interfaces β core-cache-traits
- Implement cache invalidation strategies β core-cache-invalidation
ποΈ OBSERVABILITY COMPONENTS MODULE
CRITICAL MARKUP: [CORE-OBSERVABILITY]
- Extract tracing implementation β crates/core-tracing
- Separate metrics collection β crates/core-metrics
- Create observability trait interfaces β core-observability-traits
- Implement logging utilities β crates/core-logging
π FRAMEWORK CORE DEVELOPMENT
CRITICAL MARKUP: [CORE-FRAMEWORK]
- Develop core-web-framework crate as foundation
- Implement plugin architecture for extensibility
- Create middleware system based on Tower
- Establish request/response lifecycle
π PLUGIN SYSTEM DESIGN
CRITICAL MARKUP: [PLUGIN-SYSTEM]
- Define plugin interface specifications
- Create plugin loading mechanism
- Implement plugin lifecycle management
- Design plugin configuration system
π§© TEMPLATE PROJECTS
CRITICAL MARKUP: [TEMPLATES]
- Create web API template β template-web-api
- Develop GraphQL template β template-graphql
- Implement gRPC template β template-grpc
- Design WebSocket template β template-websocket
π‘οΈ ENTERPRISE SECURITY MODULES
CRITICAL MARKUP: [ENTERPRISE-SECURITY]
- Package security features as optional modules
- Create observability tooling
- Implement resilience patterns as libraries
- Develop multi-database adapters
Week 1: Architecture Review
MARKUP SIGN: [ARCH-REVIEW]
π Document current component dependencies
π Identify tight coupling points
ποΈ Define module boundaries
π Create dependency graphs
Week 2: API Design
MARKUP SIGN: [API-DESIGN]
π§© Define trait interfaces for each component
π Design plugin architecture
π Create middleware specifications
β Establish error handling patterns
Week 1: Authentication Module
MARKUP SIGN: [AUTH-EXTRACT]
π Extract JWT implementation
π Separate OIDC integration
π§© Create authentication trait interfaces
π§ͺ Implement testing utilities
Week 2: Database Abstraction
MARKUP SIGN: [DB-EXTRACT]
π Extract database connection pooling
π¨ Separate query builder implementations
π§© Create database trait interfaces
π Implement migration utilities
Week 1: Framework Core Development
MARKUP SIGN: [FRAMEWORK-CORE]
β‘ Create lightweight HTTP framework
π Implement middleware system
π Design plugin loading mechanism
π Establish request lifecycle
SPEED MARKER: [PERF-OPT]
β±οΈ Optimize framework core
π€ Implement lazy loading
β‘ Add compile-time optimizations
π Create performance benchmarks
SECURITY MARKER: [SEC-HARDEN]
π‘οΈ Implement security best practices
β
Add input validation
π§ͺ Create security testing suite
π Document security guidelines
QA MARKER: [QUALITY-ASSURE]
π§ͺ Implement testing standards
π Create benchmarking suite
β
Add code quality checks
π¦ Establish release processes
PRIORITY 1: [CRITICAL-PATH]
1. Component isolation
2. API standardization
3. Framework core development
4. Plugin architecture
PRIORITY 2: [IMPORTANT]
1. Configuration system
2. Feature flags
3. Template projects
4. Documentation hub
PRIORITY 3: [ENHANCEMENT]
1. Enterprise modules
2. Operations tooling
3. Support infrastructure
4. Training programs
METRIC TRACKING: [TECH-METRICS]
π Modularity: 90% of components can be used independently
β±οΈ Performance: <5% overhead compared to direct framework usage
π Compatibility: 100% backward compatibility during major version
π Documentation: 100% API coverage with examples
π§ͺ Testing: 90% code coverage across all crates
COMMUNITY TRACKING: [COMMUNITY-METRICS]
π Adoption: 1000+ downloads of core framework crate within 6 months
π₯ Contributions: 50+ community contributors within 12 months
π§© Ecosystem: 20+ compatible community crates within 12 months
β‘ Issues: <24 hour average response time to issues
π¦ Releases: Monthly minor releases with bug fixes and features
RISK MITIGATION: [TECH-RISK]
π§ Complexity Management: Regular architecture reviews and simplification
β±οΈ Performance Degradation: Continuous benchmarking and optimization
π Compatibility Issues: Comprehensive testing matrix
COMMUNITY RISK: [COMM-RISK]
π Adoption Barriers: Extensive documentation and examples
π₯ Contribution Challenges: Clear contribution guidelines and mentorship
π§© Ecosystem Fragmentation: Quality standards and curation
TEAM FOCUS: [TEAM-STRUCTURE]
π¨βπ» Framework Architect: 1 FTE - Overall architecture and design
π¨βπ» Senior Developers: 3 FTE - Core implementation and code quality
π Documentation Specialist: 1 FTE - Documentation and examples
π₯ Community Manager: 1 FTE - Community engagement and support
βοΈ DevOps Engineer: 1 FTE - CI/CD and infrastructure
TIMELINE MARKER: [MILESTONES]
π Phase 1 (Months 1-3): Independent crates, API documentation
π Phase 2 (Months 4-6): Framework core, plugin architecture
π Phase 3 (Months 7-9): Community ecosystem, quality standards
π Phase 4 (Months 10-12): Enterprise modules, support infrastructure
STRATEGY: [MODULARIZATION]
1. Identify monolithic components
2. Define clear boundaries
3. Extract to independent crates
4. Establish clean APIs
5. Maintain backward compatibility
STRATEGY: [COMMUNITY-BUILD]
1. Create contribution guidelines
2. Develop tutorial content
3. Set up communication channels
4. Establish quality standards
5. Foster ecosystem growth
CHECKLIST: [PHASE-1]
β‘ Component isolation completed
β‘ API standardization defined
β‘ Dependency management optimized
β‘ Independent crates published
β‘ API documentation created
β‘ Migration guide written
β‘ Example projects developed
CHECKLIST: [PHASE-2]
β‘ Framework core developed
β‘ Plugin architecture implemented
β‘ Middleware system created
β‘ Configuration system built
β‘ Component integration tested
β‘ Plugin documentation written
β‘ Middleware examples provided
CHECKLIST: [PHASE-3]
β‘ Template projects created
β‘ Documentation hub established
β Community tools developed
β Quality assurance processes implemented
β Ecosystem of compatible crates built
β Tutorial and example content developed
β Contribution guidelines established
CHECKLIST: [PHASE-4]
β‘ Enterprise feature modules packaged
β‘ Operations tooling created
β‘ Support infrastructure established
β‘ Training and certification programs developed
β‘ Professional services offerings created
β‘ SLA and support documentation written
β‘ Enterprise support channels set up
This implementation guide provides clear markup signs and focus areas for transforming Core Web into a modular framework. The key is to follow the phased approach, maintain focus on critical implementation points, and track success metrics throughout the development process.
The markup signs throughout this document (marked with brackets like [CORE-AUTH], [PLUGIN-SYSTEM], etc.) indicate specific areas of focus and implementation priorities. Use these markers to guide your development efforts and ensure youβre following the roadmap effectively.